Mission Intelligence Systems

Engagements

Four ways to work together.

Every engagement starts from the same place: what the organization's conditions actually are, rather than what anyone believes them to be. What differs is how far you want to take it.

Fees are set per engagement and quoted directly. The scope of each is fixed and stated here, so the conversation is about fit rather than about what you would be buying.

Start

You have a result and want to know what it means.

Diagnose

You want to know what is actually constraining the organization.

Build

You have a diagnosis and need it to become an owned plan.

Partner

You want the work carried between the sessions.

  • Standing Advisory

    Monthly

    Ten hours a month, async-first, with one scheduled call. Cancel on 30 days.

    Scoped in conversation: a standing relationship is scoped in conversation, not chosen from a page.

  • Executive Partner

    Monthly

    Twenty hours a month, one quarterly planning cycle included, direct access.

    Scoped in conversation: a standing relationship is scoped in conversation, not chosen from a page.

The method, end to end

Where each engagement sits.

Most of the market owns one of these steps. Measurement, or benchmarks, or the offsite, or the execution cadence. The value is in the sequence, because a diagnosis nobody acts on and a plan built on the wrong constraint fail in the same way.

  1. Step 1See the conditionA reading of the four conditions and the one most likely to be constraining you.Start the diagnostic
  2. Step 2Align the leadership teamWhere your leaders disagree about the same organization, on the same day. The disagreement is the finding.Leadership Team Diagnostic
  3. Step 3Rebuild the operating modelThe full instrument across the organization, a report, and a findings session against the constraint.Comprehensive Diagnostic
  4. Step 4Run the cycleA quarter of work with owners and dates, and a debrief that says what actually moved.Quarterly Readiness Planning
  5. Step 5Measure what changedThe same instrument again, against the recorded earlier result. The comparison is the point.How the cycles work

Step five returns to step one. Readiness is not a project that finishes, and the comparison against a recorded earlier reading is what tells you whether anything changed.

See the output before you buy it.

Three finished reports on the same fictional organization, generated by the software that produces the real ones rather than mocked up to look like them. The differences between them are the differences between the tiers: what one leader sees, what five leaders answering separately reveal that none of them could see alone, and what sixty items reach that forty do not.

One leader

Individual diagnostic report

The four conditions scored, the indicated constraint, and a 90 day plan against it.

The full instrument

Comprehensive report

Sixty items rather than forty, on a fixed form, so every respondent answered the same questions and the spread between them means something.

Five leaders

Leadership team report

The same organization read five ways, with the disagreements named. The divergence is the finding, not the average.

Northwind Logistics is invented, and every answer in both reports is generated from a fixed seed. No client engagement has ever been published, and none will be.

Before you decide, read the method.

The diagnostic's scoring, its thresholds, what it is intended to support and what it explicitly does not yet claim are all published. So is the list of psychometric properties no study has established for it yet. Read that before an engagement rather than after one.

Methodology and limitsWhat happens to your dataStart with the free diagnostic

Start the Conversation

Work with us

Leave your name and email. We will reach out directly within one business day.